Filed: Jun. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6133 MARVIN J. MOODY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985, Defendant – Appellee, and CAITLIN R. KELLEY, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; CLARENCE N. JENKINS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00927-GBL-JFA) Submitted: May 18, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6133 MARVIN J. MOODY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985, Defendant – Appellee, and CAITLIN R. KELLEY, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; CLARENCE N. JENKINS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00927-GBL-JFA) Submitted: May 18, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6133
MARVIN J. MOODY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CAITLIN R. KELLEY, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney;
CLARENCE N. JENKINS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:11-cv-00927-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: May 18, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin J. Moody, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marvin J. Moody seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of
Defendant Caitlin R. Kelley from this action under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). The order Moody seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order,
as it disposes of fewer than all the parties involved in this
lawsuit. Accordingly, because this matter remains pending
against Defendant Todd B. Perseghin, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2