Filed: Apr. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6158 RONALD BROWN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ALVIN EUGENE HARRIS, M.D., individually and in his official capacity as Southampton Correctional Center facility physician; AUDREY MOORE, Nurse, LPN, individually and in her official capacity as a nurse at Southampton Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6158 RONALD BROWN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ALVIN EUGENE HARRIS, M.D., individually and in his official capacity as Southampton Correctional Center facility physician; AUDREY MOORE, Nurse, LPN, individually and in her official capacity as a nurse at Southampton Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6158 RONALD BROWN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ALVIN EUGENE HARRIS, M.D., individually and in his official capacity as Southampton Correctional Center facility physician; AUDREY MOORE, Nurse, LPN, individually and in her official capacity as a nurse at Southampton Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00613-REP) Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Jeffrey Brown, III, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Harris, No. 3:10-cv-00613-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2