Filed: Jun. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6164 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT KENNEDY, JR., a/k/a Mosquito, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-70025-NKM-1) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Kennedy, J
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6164 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT KENNEDY, JR., a/k/a Mosquito, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-70025-NKM-1) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Kennedy, Jr..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6164 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT KENNEDY, JR., a/k/a Mosquito, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-70025-NKM-1) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Kennedy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph W. H. Mott, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Kennedy, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kennedy, No. 4:01-cr-70025-NKM-1 (W.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2011 & Jan 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
