Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6173 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHEVELLE CROWDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:08-cr-00002-JLK-2) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chevelle Crowder, Appellant Pro
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6173 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHEVELLE CROWDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:08-cr-00002-JLK-2) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chevelle Crowder, Appellant Pro S..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6173
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHEVELLE CROWDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:08-cr-00002-JLK-2)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chevelle Crowder, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Rene Day,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chevelle Crowder appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion
seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006).
As we have recognized, however, a district court has no
authority to grant a motion to reconsider its previous order
denying a 3582(c) motion. United States v. Goodwyn,
596 F.3d
233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). And in any event, it is evident
from the record that Crowder is ineligible for the sentence
reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court. United States v. Crowder, No. 4:08-cr-
00002-JLK-2 (W.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2