Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anthony McCoy v. Chappell, 12-6379 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-6379 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6379 ANTHONY J. MCCOY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAPPELL, Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center; ANDERSON, Sgt., Nottoway Correctional Center; HURST, Capt., Nottoway Correctional Center; WALTON, Lieutenant, Nottoway Correctional Center; STOKES, Lieutenant, Nottoway Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, D
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6379 ANTHONY J. MCCOY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAPPELL, Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center; ANDERSON, Sgt., Nottoway Correctional Center; HURST, Capt., Nottoway Correctional Center; WALTON, Lieutenant, Nottoway Correctional Center; STOKES, Lieutenant, Nottoway Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00756-JRS) Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 19, 2012 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony J. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony J. McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Chappell, No. 3:10-cv-00756-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer