Filed: Jun. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6473 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO MERLIN HARMON, a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00825-CMC-19) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Harmon, App
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6473 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO MERLIN HARMON, a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00825-CMC-19) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Harmon, Appe..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6473 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO MERLIN HARMON, a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00825-CMC-19) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denis Haynes, Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., Mark C. Moore, Tommie DeWayne Pearson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Merlin Harmon appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harmon, No. 3:09-cr- 00825-CMC (D.S.C. Dec. 15, 2011 & Feb. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2