Filed: Jul. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6671 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAVOD RAMON LIPSCOMB, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00280-REP-1) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Javod Ramon Lipscomb, Appella
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6671 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAVOD RAMON LIPSCOMB, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00280-REP-1) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Javod Ramon Lipscomb, Appellan..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6671 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAVOD RAMON LIPSCOMB, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00280-REP-1) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Javod Ramon Lipscomb, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Javod Ramon Lipscomb appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lipscomb, No. 3:07-cr-00280-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2012). We deny Lipscomb’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
