Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Donnie Howell v. Eric Wilson, 12-6744 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-6744 Visitors: 64
Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6744 DONNIE KEITH HOWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00292-CMH-TRJ) Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012 Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
More
                               UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                               No. 12-6744


DONNIE KEITH HOWELL,

                Petitioner - Appellant,

          v.

ERIC D. WILSON, Warden,

                Respondent - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00292-CMH-TRJ)


Submitted:   August 16, 2012                 Decided:   August 21, 2012


Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Donnie Keith Howell, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Donnie Keith Howell, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition.         We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error.           Accordingly, although we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.           Howell v. Wilson, No. 1:12-cv-

00292-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 21, 2012; entered Mar. 23,

2012).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal    contentions   are   adequately   presented    in   the    materials

before   the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the   decisional

process.



                                                                    AFFIRMED




                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer