Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6778 RANDY DRUMMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. BEARDEN; MEDICAL CORP INC, Defendants – Appellees, and JON E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Dept of Correction; JENNY ARDIS, Administrative Coordinator of Division of Health Services; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (8:10-cv-02423-TLW) S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6778 RANDY DRUMMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. BEARDEN; MEDICAL CORP INC, Defendants – Appellees, and JON E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Dept of Correction; JENNY ARDIS, Administrative Coordinator of Division of Health Services; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (8:10-cv-02423-TLW) Su..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6778
RANDY DRUMMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. BEARDEN; MEDICAL CORP INC,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JON E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Dept of Correction;
JENNY ARDIS, Administrative Coordinator of Division of Health
Services; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(8:10-cv-02423-TLW)
Submitted: July 31, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Drummond, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Randy Drummond appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint after entry of judgment. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See Drummond v. Ozmint, No. 8:10-cv-
02423-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2012; Feb. 17, 2012; Dec. 5, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3