Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7088 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONTE GWYNN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-5) Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012 Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7088 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONTE GWYNN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-5) Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012 Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7088
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONTE GWYNN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-5)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donte Gwynn, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant
United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donte Gwynn appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error, given that Gwynn is ineligible for the
reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court. United States v. Gwynn, No. 4:07-cr-00112-
RGD-FBS-5 (E.D. Va. June 12, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2