Filed: Dec. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7329 ROGER DALE TERRY, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. M. MIDDLETON, Ofc, COS; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; SLATE STATE, Sgt, Rep; P. SHIELDS, D.O.C., Co2; FRED NASTRI, H.O., Defendants – Appellees, and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; SCOTT OAKLEY, Executive Director of the IGO; J. L. TRUE, Captain; LENORA C. ADEGBESON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at B
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7329 ROGER DALE TERRY, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. M. MIDDLETON, Ofc, COS; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; SLATE STATE, Sgt, Rep; P. SHIELDS, D.O.C., Co2; FRED NASTRI, H.O., Defendants – Appellees, and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; SCOTT OAKLEY, Executive Director of the IGO; J. L. TRUE, Captain; LENORA C. ADEGBESON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Ba..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7329 ROGER DALE TERRY, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. M. MIDDLETON, Ofc, COS; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; SLATE STATE, Sgt, Rep; P. SHIELDS, D.O.C., Co2; FRED NASTRI, H.O., Defendants – Appellees, and DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; SCOTT OAKLEY, Executive Director of the IGO; J. L. TRUE, Captain; LENORA C. ADEGBESON, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01686-ELH) Submitted: November 29, 2012 Decided: December 13, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Dale Terry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Nancy P. Tennis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Roger Dale Terry, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Terry v. Middleton, No. 1:11-cv-01686-ELH (D. Md. June 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3