Filed: Nov. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7658 DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AGENCY, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12- cv-02524-RWT) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7658 DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AGENCY, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12- cv-02524-RWT) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7658 DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AGENCY, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12- cv-02524-RWT) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dickinson Norman Adionser, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dickinson Norman Adionser appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint filed pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2006) and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Adionser v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-02524-RWT (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
