Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HENNEGHAN v. ROACH, 11-2075. (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: infco20120221117 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gerald Henneghan appeals the district court's orders dismissing his amended employment discrimination complaint, denying his motions for reconsideration, and denying various nondispositive motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henneghan v. Smith , No. 1:11-cv-00247-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. May 3, 2011; May 4, 2011; May 5, 2011;
More

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Henneghan appeals the district court's orders dismissing his amended employment discrimination complaint, denying his motions for reconsideration, and denying various nondispositive motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henneghan v. Smith, No. 1:11-cv-00247-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. May 3, 2011; May 4, 2011; May 5, 2011; Sept. 1, 2011; Sept. 12, 2011; Sept. 19, 2011; Sept. 30, 2011; Oct. 3, 2011; Oct. 5, 2011). We deny Henneghan's requests for counsel, recusal, and other relief on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer