NEFF v. CMS, 11-7513. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120403100
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frank M. Neff appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Neff v. CMS , No. 1:11-cv-00582-RDB (D. Md. filed Oct. 31, 2011, and entered Nov. 1, 2011). We deny all of Neff's pending motions for relief and we dispense with oral argument because the
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frank M. Neff appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Neff v. CMS , No. 1:11-cv-00582-RDB (D. Md. filed Oct. 31, 2011, and entered Nov. 1, 2011). We deny all of Neff's pending motions for relief and we dispense with oral argument because the ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frank M. Neff appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Neff v. CMS, No. 1:11-cv-00582-RDB (D. Md. filed Oct. 31, 2011, and entered Nov. 1, 2011). We deny all of Neff's pending motions for relief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
