U.S. v. PEOPLES, 12-6062. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120522129
Visitors: 1
Filed: May 22, 2012
Latest Update: May 22, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Danny Lee Peoples appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Peoples, No. 7:07-cr-00084-JCT-3 (W.D. Va. Dec. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Danny Lee Peoples appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Peoples, No. 7:07-cr-00084-JCT-3 (W.D. Va. Dec. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Danny Lee Peoples appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Peoples, No. 7:07-cr-00084-JCT-3 (W.D. Va. Dec. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
