FISHMAN v. U.S., 11-7521. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120530108
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 30, 2012
Latest Update: May 30, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald F. Fishman appeals the district court's order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his Federal Tort Claims Act suit and the court's denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fishman v. United States, No. 5:08-ct-03115-BO (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2011; Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argu
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald F. Fishman appeals the district court's order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his Federal Tort Claims Act suit and the court's denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fishman v. United States, No. 5:08-ct-03115-BO (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2011; Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argum..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald F. Fishman appeals the district court's order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his Federal Tort Claims Act suit and the court's denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fishman v. United States, No. 5:08-ct-03115-BO (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2011; Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
