PURANDA v. KELLETT, 12-6145. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120530132
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 30, 2012
Latest Update: May 30, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph V. Puranda appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puranda v. Kellett, No. 3:10-cv-00336-HEH (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 2011). We also deny Puranda's motions for transcripts at government expense and for production of documents. We dispense
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph V. Puranda appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puranda v. Kellett, No. 3:10-cv-00336-HEH (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 2011). We also deny Puranda's motions for transcripts at government expense and for production of documents. We dispense w..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph V. Puranda appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puranda v. Kellett, No. 3:10-cv-00336-HEH (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 2011). We also deny Puranda's motions for transcripts at government expense and for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
