Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. DeAVILEZ, 11-1880. (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: infco20120726092 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Soledad Lopez De Avilez and Mateo Avilez Duarte appeal the district court's order dismissing their petition with respect to real property subject to an order of forfeiture and entering a final order of forfeiture. The district court dismissed the petition as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order compelling discovery. We have reviewed the briefs and the relevant portions of the record and find no abuse of
More

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Soledad Lopez De Avilez and Mateo Avilez Duarte appeal the district court's order dismissing their petition with respect to real property subject to an order of forfeiture and entering a final order of forfeiture. The district court dismissed the petition as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order compelling discovery. We have reviewed the briefs and the relevant portions of the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Avilez, No. 7:08-cr-00028-D-1 (E.D.N.C. July 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer