U.S. v. JONES, 12-6955. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120821136
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Travis Dell Jones appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 1:08-cr-00040-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Travis Dell Jones appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 1:08-cr-00040-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Travis Dell Jones appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 1:08-cr-00040-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
