U.S. EX REL ABOU-HUSSEIN v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, 12-1701. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120823086
Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alex Abou-Hussein appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abou-Hussein v. Science Applications Int'l Corp., No. 2:09-cv-01858-RMG (D.S.C. May 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alex Abou-Hussein appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abou-Hussein v. Science Applications Int'l Corp., No. 2:09-cv-01858-RMG (D.S.C. May 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the m..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alex Abou-Hussein appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abou-Hussein v. Science Applications Int'l Corp., No. 2:09-cv-01858-RMG (D.S.C. May 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
