U.S. v. HUGHES, 12-6808. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121001088
Filed: Oct. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth Bronson Hughes appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006), and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 6:02-cr-70105-NKM-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2012; Apr. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument bec
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth Bronson Hughes appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006), and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 6:02-cr-70105-NKM-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2012; Apr. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument beca..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Bronson Hughes appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 6:02-cr-70105-NKM-2 (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2012; Apr. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle