U.S. v. BRIM, 12-6993. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121102088
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Teek Brim, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brim, No. 1:07-cr-00247-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. May 21, 2012). We deny Brim's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Teek Brim, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brim, No. 1:07-cr-00247-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. May 21, 2012). We deny Brim's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal content..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Teek Brim, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brim, No. 1:07-cr-00247-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. May 21, 2012). We deny Brim's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
