BARTLETT v. ROBESON, 12-7156. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121127148
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ricky Bartlett appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint and his numerous motions for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bartlett v. Robeson, No. 5:11-ct-03008-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21 & June 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ricky Bartlett appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint and his numerous motions for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bartlett v. Robeson, No. 5:11-ct-03008-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21 & June 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and leg..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Bartlett appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and his numerous motions for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bartlett v. Robeson, No. 5:11-ct-03008-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21 & June 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
