U.S. v. JENKINS, 12-7339. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121129173
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Jenkins appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jenkins , No. 2:93-cr-00081-2 (E.D. Va. July 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adeq
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Jenkins appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jenkins , No. 2:93-cr-00081-2 (E.D. Va. July 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Anthony Jenkins appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jenkins, No. 2:93-cr-00081-2 (E.D. Va. July 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
