Filed: Dec. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lokesh Vuyyuru, M.D., Virginia Gastroenterology Associates PC, and Virginia Times, Inc., appeal from the district court's various orders (1) dismissing their complaint, (2) imposing sanctions and a pre-filing injunction, (3) denying their motion to vacate, (4) denying their motion to reconsider, (5) denying their motion for disclosure from the court, and (6) denying their motion to disqualify the district court judge.
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lokesh Vuyyuru, M.D., Virginia Gastroenterology Associates PC, and Virginia Times, Inc., appeal from the district court's various orders (1) dismissing their complaint, (2) imposing sanctions and a pre-filing injunction, (3) denying their motion to vacate, (4) denying their motion to reconsider, (5) denying their motion for disclosure from the court, and (6) denying their motion to disqualify the district court judge. ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lokesh Vuyyuru, M.D., Virginia Gastroenterology Associates PC, and Virginia Times, Inc., appeal from the district court's various orders (1) dismissing their complaint, (2) imposing sanctions and a pre-filing injunction, (3) denying their motion to vacate, (4) denying their motion to reconsider, (5) denying their motion for disclosure from the court, and (6) denying their motion to disqualify the district court judge. We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and have considered the arguments made by the Appellants and their amici, both in their briefs and at oral argument. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Vuyyuru v. Jadhav, No. 3:10-cv-173 (E.D. Va. April 19, 2011 & Aug. 30, 2011). We also deny the Appellees' pending motion for sanctions and deny, as moot, the Appellants' related motion to strike.
AFFIRMED.
