GALLIPEAU v. MICKENS-HAM, 12-7508. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121227107
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis Gallipeau appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gallipeau v. Mickens-Ham, No. 3:09-cv-01883-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dennis Gallipeau appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gallipeau v. Mickens-Ham, No. 3:09-cv-01883-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and l..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Gallipeau appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gallipeau v. Mickens-Ham, No. 3:09-cv-01883-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
