U.S. v. BORDERS, 12-7623. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121227115
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerome Lee Borders appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Borders, No. 5:01-cr-00006-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerome Lee Borders appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Borders, No. 5:01-cr-00006-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Lee Borders appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Borders, No. 5:01-cr-00006-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
