DE'LONTA v. CLARKE, 12-7634. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121227117
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ophelia Azriel De'Lonta seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing all but one Defendant, Sarah Pruitt, in De'Lonta's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The o
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ophelia Azriel De'Lonta seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing all but one Defendant, Sarah Pruitt, in De'Lonta's 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The or..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ophelia Azriel De'Lonta seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing all but one Defendant, Sarah Pruitt, in De'Lonta's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order De'Lonta seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as it disposes of fewer than all the parties involved in this lawsuit. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
