Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Kenneth Nelson, 12-2049 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2049 Visitors: 52
Filed: Apr. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2049 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH L. NELSON; WANDA B. NELSON, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge; F. Bradford Stillman, Magistrate Judge. (2:12-cv-00218- RAJ-FBS) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2049 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH L. NELSON; WANDA B. NELSON, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge; F. Bradford Stillman, Magistrate Judge. (2:12-cv-00218- RAJ-FBS) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth L. Nelson, Wanda B. Nelson, Appellants Pro Se. Karen Grace Gregory, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kenneth L. Nelson and Wanda B. Nelson appeal the district court’s orders approving a levy on their property pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6334(e)(1)(A) (2006) and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nelson, No. 2:12-cv-00218-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. June 27, 2012; Nov. 27, 2012). We grant the Appellee’s motions to strike but deny all other pending motions filed in this appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer