Filed: Mar. 14, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2214 LAURIE SCHMEHL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00183-GCM) Submitted: February 28, 2013 Decided: March 14, 2013 Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bartina L. Edwards, LAW OFFICE
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2214 LAURIE SCHMEHL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00183-GCM) Submitted: February 28, 2013 Decided: March 14, 2013 Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bartina L. Edwards, LAW OFFICE ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2214 LAURIE SCHMEHL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00183-GCM) Submitted: February 28, 2013 Decided: March 14, 2013 Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bartina L. Edwards, LAW OFFICE OF BARTINA EDWARDS, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gregory P. McGuire, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Laurie Schmehl appeals from the district court’s order denying relief in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record before this court as well as the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schmehl v. US Airways, Inc., No. 3:11-cv-00183-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
