Filed: Apr. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2315 ANGELA SPAIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Defendant – Appellee, and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. David C. Keesler, Magistrate Judge. (3:10-cv-00139-DCK) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2315 ANGELA SPAIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Defendant – Appellee, and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. David C. Keesler, Magistrate Judge. (3:10-cv-00139-DCK) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2315
ANGELA SPAIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. David C. Keesler,
Magistrate Judge. (3:10-cv-00139-DCK)
Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angela Spain, Appellant Pro Se. Austin F. Breen, Kimberly Quade
Cacheris, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Angela Spain appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting Cellco Partnership’s motion for summary judgment in her
civil action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.
2012), and North Carolina law. * We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Spain v. Cellco P’Ship,
No. 3:10-cv-00139-DCK (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 2006
& Supp. 2012).
2