Filed: Apr. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2383 CAROL A. FORTI, a/k/a Carol Ann Forti, Debtor - Appellant, v. ANDREW S. ROSS, Creditor – Appellee, THOMAS P. GORMAN, Chapter 13 Trustee, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00785-GBL-TRJ) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2383 CAROL A. FORTI, a/k/a Carol Ann Forti, Debtor - Appellant, v. ANDREW S. ROSS, Creditor – Appellee, THOMAS P. GORMAN, Chapter 13 Trustee, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00785-GBL-TRJ) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismis..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2383
CAROL A. FORTI, a/k/a Carol Ann Forti,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
ANDREW S. ROSS,
Creditor – Appellee,
THOMAS P. GORMAN, Chapter 13 Trustee,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:12-cv-00785-GBL-TRJ)
Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carol A. Forti, Appellant Pro Se. George E. Tuttle, Jr.,
Alexandria, Virginia; Eva Choi, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13
TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carol A. Forti appeals from the district court’s order
denying her motion for a stay of the disbursement of funds in
her bankruptcy case pending appeal. All funds of the bankruptcy
estate have now been distributed and a discharge granted.
Accordingly, this appeal is moot. See In re Stadium Mgt. Corp.,
895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st Cir. 1990) (“Absent a stay, the court
must dismiss a pending appeal as moot because the court has no
remedy that it can fashion even if it would have determined the
issues differently.”). We deny Forti’s pending motions and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2