Filed: Jun. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2537 KENNETH VALENTINE AWE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LAKEWAY PUBLISHERS OF MO. INC.; R. J. FISHMAN, President of Lakeway Publishers of MO. Inc. owner of Lincoln County Journal; KATHY COLBERT, Publisher of Lincoln County Journal, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:12-cv-00528-JLK-RSB) Submitted: Ap
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2537 KENNETH VALENTINE AWE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LAKEWAY PUBLISHERS OF MO. INC.; R. J. FISHMAN, President of Lakeway Publishers of MO. Inc. owner of Lincoln County Journal; KATHY COLBERT, Publisher of Lincoln County Journal, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:12-cv-00528-JLK-RSB) Submitted: Apr..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2537
KENNETH VALENTINE AWE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LAKEWAY PUBLISHERS OF MO. INC.; R. J. FISHMAN, President of
Lakeway Publishers of MO. Inc. owner of Lincoln County
Journal; KATHY COLBERT, Publisher of Lincoln County
Journal,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:12-cv-00528-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: April 5, 2013 Decided: June 3, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Valentine Awe, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth V. Awe seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)(B)(ii) (2006). This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Awe seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Domino v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993) (finding dismissals without
prejudice generally unappealable). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2