Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jacori Carter v. D. Farmer, 12-7625 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-7625 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7625 JACORI ANDRE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. FARMER, Correctional Officer; JOHNNY HALL, Correctional Officer; CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, Sergeant, Defendants – Appellees, and NURSE MEADE, LPN; TONY ADAMS, Investigator Sgt.; T. S. RAY, Warden; C/O RAMEY, Correctional Officer; PRISON GUARD POWERS, Correctional Officer; NURSE A. BOWENS; L. YATES, LPN; ROLETTE, Assistant Warden; J. LAMBERT, Sergeant; R. MULLINS, Grievance C
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7625 JACORI ANDRE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. FARMER, Correctional Officer; JOHNNY HALL, Correctional Officer; CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, Sergeant, Defendants – Appellees, and NURSE MEADE, LPN; TONY ADAMS, Investigator Sgt.; T. S. RAY, Warden; C/O RAMEY, Correctional Officer; PRISON GUARD POWERS, Correctional Officer; NURSE A. BOWENS; L. YATES, LPN; ROLETTE, Assistant Warden; J. LAMBERT, Sergeant; R. MULLINS, Grievance Coordinator, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:12-cv-00008-GEC-RSB) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 9, 2013 Before DAVIS, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacori Andre Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Jacori Andre Carter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Carter’s motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Carter v. Farmer, No. 7:12-cv-00008-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We reject Carter’s challenge to the district court’s refusal to sanction Defendants for their alleged spoliation of evidence. 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer