Filed: Mar. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7922 SYLVESTER MIDDLETON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:12-cv-00266-SGW-RSB) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: March 27, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylvester Middleton,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7922 SYLVESTER MIDDLETON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:12-cv-00266-SGW-RSB) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: March 27, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylvester Middleton, J..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7922 SYLVESTER MIDDLETON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN CHRISTOPHER ZYCH, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:12-cv-00266-SGW-RSB) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: March 27, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylvester Middleton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sylvester Middleton, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Middleton v. Zych, No. 7:12-cv-00266-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2012). We deny Middleton’s motion to compel production of documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
