Filed: Apr. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7967 MARK CORRIGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANNY TUCKER, Case Manager FCC Petersburg Camp, Virginia; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden FCI Petersburg, Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00178-RAJ-TEM) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 26, 2013 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7967 MARK CORRIGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANNY TUCKER, Case Manager FCC Petersburg Camp, Virginia; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden FCI Petersburg, Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00178-RAJ-TEM) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 26, 2013 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circui..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7967
MARK CORRIGAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANNY TUCKER, Case Manager FCC Petersburg Camp, Virginia;
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden FCI Petersburg, Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00178-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 26, 2013
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter,
Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel Patrick Shean, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Corrigan appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Corrigan v. Tucker, No. 2:11-cv-00178-RAJ-TEM
(E.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2