Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Edward Jefferson v. Frank Bishop, 12-8163 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-8163 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8163 EDWARD W. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN FRANK BISHOP; M. NORTHCRAFT; JAMES TICHNELL; B. MCKENZIE; PAULA R. WILLIAMS; MS. GORDON; ERIC ROUNDS; JEFF NINES, CCMS; R. DAVIS, CCMS II; SGT. SHIMKO, Coordinator; SCOTT OAKLEY, Execution Director; MAJOR DENNY MELLOTT; CAPTAIN HINES; DR. JACK CUNNING, School Principal; LT. A. J. LEE; STATE OF MD., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8163 EDWARD W. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN FRANK BISHOP; M. NORTHCRAFT; JAMES TICHNELL; B. MCKENZIE; PAULA R. WILLIAMS; MS. GORDON; ERIC ROUNDS; JEFF NINES, CCMS; R. DAVIS, CCMS II; SGT. SHIMKO, Coordinator; SCOTT OAKLEY, Execution Director; MAJOR DENNY MELLOTT; CAPTAIN HINES; DR. JACK CUNNING, School Principal; LT. A. J. LEE; STATE OF MD., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-03497-JFM) Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 29, 2013 Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward W. Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward W. Jefferson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jefferson v. Bishop, No. 1:12-cv-03497-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer