Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Linda Valerino v. Eric Holder, Jr., 13-1390 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-1390 Visitors: 39
Filed: Sep. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1390 LINDA I. VALERINO, Plaintiff – Appellant, and DORA M. ALVARADO; JEFFREY L. BOHN; MARGARITA V. SERNA; TAM M. WYATT, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01124-GBL-JFA
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1390 LINDA I. VALERINO, Plaintiff – Appellant, and DORA M. ALVARADO; JEFFREY L. BOHN; MARGARITA V. SERNA; TAM M. WYATT, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01124-GBL-JFA) Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 19, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda I. Valerino, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Elizabeth Cross, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Kevin J. Mikolashek, R. Joseph Sher, Lauren Anne Wetzler, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Linda I. Valerino appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination case arising from Valerino’s employment with the United States Marshals Service. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion. Valerino v. Holder, No. 1:11-cv-01124-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2013). We deny Valerino’s motion for leave to file exhibits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer