Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Frederick Taylor v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 13-1429 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-1429 Visitors: 33
Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1429 FREDERICK W. TAYLOR; ALEKSANDRA TAYLOR, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; POORE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, LTD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00072-RLV-DSC) Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 26, 2013 Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1429 FREDERICK W. TAYLOR; ALEKSANDRA TAYLOR, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; POORE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, LTD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00072-RLV-DSC) Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 26, 2013 Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick W. Taylor, Aleksandra Taylor, Appellants Pro Se. Christina Rampey Hunoval, HUNOVAL LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants Frederick and Aleksandra Taylor appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action in which they sought vacatur of the foreclosure sale of their North Carolina home. * We have reviewed the district court’s order in conjunction with the relevant record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant the Taylors’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. See Taylor v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC., No. 5:11–cv–00072–RLV- DSC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The Taylors initially brought the underlying civil action in state court, but Defendants timely removed it to federal court. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1441(a) (West Supp. 2013). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer