Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Trey Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Products, LLC, 13-1434 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-1434 Visitors: 34
Filed: Sep. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1434 TREY Z. COOPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DSM NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:11-cv-02553-RBH) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pheobe A. Clark, WUKELA LAW F
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1434 TREY Z. COOPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DSM NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:11-cv-02553-RBH) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pheobe A. Clark, WUKELA LAW FIRM, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. Christopher G. Mackaronis, BRICKFIELD, BURCHETTE, RITTS & STONE, PC, Washington, D.C.; Jonathan P. Pearson, FISHER AND PHILLIPS LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Trey Z. Cooper appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of DSM Nutritional Products, LLC, in Cooper’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Prods., LLC, No. 4:11-cv-02553-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer