Filed: Jul. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1508 RONALD SATISH EMRIT; NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDZ, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CHEAP-O-AIR; HOTEL ALISIOS BAVARO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13- cv-00803-PWG) Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronal
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1508 RONALD SATISH EMRIT; NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDZ, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CHEAP-O-AIR; HOTEL ALISIOS BAVARO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13- cv-00803-PWG) Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1508 RONALD SATISH EMRIT; NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDZ, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CHEAP-O-AIR; HOTEL ALISIOS BAVARO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13- cv-00803-PWG) Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Satish Emrit; Nicole Rocio Leal-Mendz, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit and Nicole Rocio Leal-Mendz appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v. Cheap-O-Air, No. 8:13-cv-00803-PWG (D. Md. Apr. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
