Filed: Aug. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1511 ANTHONY ROMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SAM’S CLUB/WALMART; BEVERLY GRUBBS, Personnel Manager; GREG SMITH, Store Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00524-JCT) Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 2, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1511 ANTHONY ROMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SAM’S CLUB/WALMART; BEVERLY GRUBBS, Personnel Manager; GREG SMITH, Store Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00524-JCT) Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 2, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1511 ANTHONY ROMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SAM’S CLUB/WALMART; BEVERLY GRUBBS, Personnel Manager; GREG SMITH, Store Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00524-JCT) Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 2, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Roman, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Kraham, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Sam’s Club. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Roman appeals the district court’s orders partially dismissing his complaint and granting summary judgment on the remaining religious discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roman v. Sam’s Club/Walmart, No. 7:10-cv-00524-JCT (W.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
