Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nancy Legum v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC, 13-1679 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-1679 Visitors: 41
Filed: Sep. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1679 NANCY E. LEGUM; ANTHONY E. KURTZ, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC., Successor to J.B. Hanauer & Co; SAMUEL KLUFT KOLTUN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-03773-JFM) Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013 Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, an
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1679 NANCY E. LEGUM; ANTHONY E. KURTZ, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC., Successor to J.B. Hanauer & Co; SAMUEL KLUFT KOLTUN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-03773-JFM) Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013 Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy E. Legum, Anthony E. Kurtz, Appellants Pro Se. Daniel Joseph Donovan, Priscilla Alden Donovan, DONOVAN & RAINIE, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nancy E. Legum and Anthony E. Kurtz appeal the district court’s orders denying relief in their civil action and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Legum v. RBC Capital Mkts., LLC, No. 8:12-cv-03773-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2013; May 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer