Filed: Jul. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6157 PERRY MASON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (9:11-cv-01655-RMG) Submitted: June 27, 2013 Decided: July 11, 2013 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Perry Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6157 PERRY MASON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (9:11-cv-01655-RMG) Submitted: June 27, 2013 Decided: July 11, 2013 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Perry Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince,..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6157 PERRY MASON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNY ATKINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (9:11-cv-01655-RMG) Submitted: June 27, 2013 Decided: July 11, 2013 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Perry Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Perry Mason, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Mason’s motion to take judicial notice or modify record and affirm. Mason v. Atkinson, No. 9:11-cv-01655-RMG (D.S.C. Jan. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
