Filed: Sep. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6365 GABRIEL H. ACOSTA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN JOHN R. OWENS, FCI Williamsburg, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (6:12-cv-01303-DCN) Submitted: August 28, 2013 Decided: September 11, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gabriel H. Ac
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6365 GABRIEL H. ACOSTA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN JOHN R. OWENS, FCI Williamsburg, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (6:12-cv-01303-DCN) Submitted: August 28, 2013 Decided: September 11, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gabriel H. Aco..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6365
GABRIEL H. ACOSTA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN JOHN R. OWENS, FCI Williamsburg,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(6:12-cv-01303-DCN)
Submitted: August 28, 2013 Decided: September 11, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gabriel H. Acosta, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gabriel H. Acosta, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, although we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Acosta v. Owens, No. 6:12-cv-
01303-DCN (D.S.C. filed Feb. 21, 2013, and entered Feb. 22,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
Acosta’s failure to object to the magistrate judge’s
recommended disposition of his failure-to-protect claim waives
our review of the district court’s disposition of that claim.
See United States v. Midgette,
478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir.
2007).
2