Filed: Dec. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6967 JAMES D. WILKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. INERIO ALARCON; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00131-IMK-JSK) Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: December 9, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6967 JAMES D. WILKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. INERIO ALARCON; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00131-IMK-JSK) Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: December 9, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6967
JAMES D. WILKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. INERIO ALARCON; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00131-IMK-JSK)
Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: December 9, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James D. Wilkes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James D. Wilkes appeals the district court’s order
adopting as modified the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilkes v.
Alarcon, No. 1:11-cv-00131-IMK-JSK (N.D. W. Va. May 21, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2