Filed: Sep. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6991 MAURICE GRAVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LAUREN B. STEVENS, Public Defender of Sumter County; SUMTER COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00826-JFA) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6991 MAURICE GRAVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LAUREN B. STEVENS, Public Defender of Sumter County; SUMTER COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00826-JFA) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affir..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6991 MAURICE GRAVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LAUREN B. STEVENS, Public Defender of Sumter County; SUMTER COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00826-JFA) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Maurice Graves appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil rights complaint and dismissing his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graves v. Stevens, No. 3:12-cv-00826-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2012; June 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
