Filed: Nov. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7028 WILLIE WORLEY, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ALVIN KELLER, Secretary of Prisons; ROBERT LEWIS, Director of Prisons; HATTIE B. PIMPONG, Chief Disciplinary Hearing Officer; REGINALD E. MIGETTE, SR., Chairman of Inmate Grievance Board, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03012-BO) Submitted
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7028 WILLIE WORLEY, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ALVIN KELLER, Secretary of Prisons; ROBERT LEWIS, Director of Prisons; HATTIE B. PIMPONG, Chief Disciplinary Hearing Officer; REGINALD E. MIGETTE, SR., Chairman of Inmate Grievance Board, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03012-BO) Submitted:..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7028
WILLIE WORLEY, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ALVIN KELLER, Secretary of Prisons; ROBERT LEWIS, Director
of Prisons; HATTIE B. PIMPONG, Chief Disciplinary Hearing
Officer; REGINALD E. MIGETTE, SR., Chairman of Inmate
Grievance Board,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03012-BO)
Submitted: October 10, 2013 Decided: November 6, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Worley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Scott Bartley Goodson,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willie Worley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Worley v. Keller, No. 5:11-ct-03012-BO (E.D.N.C.
June 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2