Filed: Dec. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7442 CURTIS RAY BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIPTROT, Lieutenant/Supervisor; DR. NICHOLS, Psychiatrist, Defendants - Appellees, and T. L. BIRKHEAD, Program Supervisor; T. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer; R. CLARY, Evidence Based Practice-Manager; WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator; K. S. TURNER, Lieutenant/Supervisor, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Al
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7442 CURTIS RAY BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIPTROT, Lieutenant/Supervisor; DR. NICHOLS, Psychiatrist, Defendants - Appellees, and T. L. BIRKHEAD, Program Supervisor; T. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer; R. CLARY, Evidence Based Practice-Manager; WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator; K. S. TURNER, Lieutenant/Supervisor, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Ale..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7442
CURTIS RAY BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIPTROT, Lieutenant/Supervisor; DR. NICHOLS, Psychiatrist,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
T. L. BIRKHEAD, Program Supervisor; T. JOHNSON, Correctional
Officer; R. CLARY, Evidence Based Practice-Manager; WENDY S.
HOBBS, Regional Administrator; K. S. TURNER,
Lieutenant/Supervisor,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01405-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Ray Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Isaac Abraham
McBeth, Edward J. McNelis, III, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Ray Brooks appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Brooks v. Liptrot, No. 1:12-cv-01405-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va.
filed Aug. 21, 2013; entered Aug. 22, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3