Filed: Dec. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7522 ANTHONY EUGENE BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:10-cv-01340) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Eugene Brooks, Appe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7522 ANTHONY EUGENE BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:10-cv-01340) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Eugene Brooks, Appel..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7522
ANTHONY EUGENE BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-01340)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Eugene Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Eugene Brooks appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort
Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (West 2006 &
Supp. 2013), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. United
States, No. 5:10-cv-01340 (S.D.W. Va. July 31, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2